Xu Ben in public life

ch11658092

I once discussed in class, students and thinkers of the 17th century, Pascal \the human condition \Original sin of the \But Adam and Eve disobeyed God's warning order, committed a sin, that original sin passed on to their offspring, so that all of mankind so far are all guilty. They must wait until Jesus came to this world again and re-save mankind, free of original sin will have the opportunity to return to God in the Creation of the original relationship with mankind.
in section 131, by Pascal himself a traditional interpretation of original sin. He ran into its own can not answer the question: To present living human beings in this world for their ancestors 6,000 years ago to bear sin, which is fair and just? Pascal believes that human beings can not answer this question, therefore, the problem for humans has become a \In a dilemma of human being, one is unable to answer this question, on the other hand can not put aside the questions of survival, that is, Pascal said, \With the mystery and survival has become the fate of mankind.
many of my students come from Catholic families, they are familiar with the \However, they do not seem to agree with Pascal's interpretation. Some students believe that a person's sin can not be passed to another person, each person need not take responsibility for the crimes of others. This is obviously a free individualistic interpretation of original sin: that no one should be doing other things in a long time ago take responsibility, he can only take his own moral responsibility for wrong things. One student said that sin passed from generation to generation in humans, not only practically impossible, and morally unjust. Many other students share this view. Personal responsibility in the United States democratic culture, this view can best be acceptable for the young students.
have a student that her anthropology classes at the school that can not literally read directly from the story of original sin, but it as a \a normal individual, must go through a transformation, that is, human moral innocence (pure ignorance, no self-consciousness) must be transformed into self-consciousness and moral self-determination. In accordance with this understanding, the original sin is not passed down from generation to generation, it has nothing to do with human history. Original sin is everyone's own business, everyone in life may have an original sin, it has affected his personal life.
another student to extend this from a sociological point of view, suggested that original sin of \is destroyed, then the resulting moral damage or injury may be over all the others, even future generations. This world history is illustrative.
I think the views of two students behind this particular significance of modern public. A certain moment in history, evil entered the world. Once the evil (injustice) to enter this world, and begin to exist there, it destructive role, and this world that no longer is the original look of. The evil or sin will inevitably change all the relationships and personal behavior, prevalence can be more than most people imagine. So the people affected have immoral behavior, and strengthening a common cause, the survival of all Evil situation.
in this situation, every person involved in the evil, all influence or encourage other portrait of his own involvement as a matter of sin and evil, no one is isolated from other people. Each appears to be the individual of liberty, in fact not from his own personal choice. He made the choice to make the behavior of his live with that society and that society is closely related to others. In the United States is such an original sin of slavery.
Interpretation of original sin and that everyone's relationship with Arendt and Javier on the analysis of totalitarian society --- corrupt totalitarian existence of human morality --- quite the same situation. For example, the \
Even the \Such as Pascal has said, these issues may provide us with a \However, another and different Pascal said, we discussed this \

Today, we are still in the \Ancient Chinese people Respect acceptance of fate, I believe that Buddha, knowing good and evil have reported that natural order, so can not misbehave. Faith in God, but also the moral standards of people remain at a certain height. But at some point in the history of the world, might completely destroy the people's \Thus, deception, lies, deception becomes the norm for social behavior, beginning in the political, social, cultural, business, human relations are all full of fake and lies. So in our real life, wicked things endless, endless, despite repeated prohibitions, there has been an \Large distortion of human nature, devoid of conscience, moral deformity, live in a world where people can not help but ask: how did we fall into such a state of moral corruption in the way? How it all start? So ask, ask actually means \
(This article Source: Southern Metropolis Daily)
相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]