Paul Picot replica watches Travel tax bill in the

soho78zw

- Southern Newspaper Network
hatred of the rich, if economic conditions Yunke, I want to buy a good car, even if a substantial tax increase. As a luxury car, not the general public can afford, even if affordable, but there is a also a big problem. Insurance,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], parking fees, tolls,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], maintenance, as well as soaring petrol prices, the fees add up, there are several middle-income families afford to raise the private car?
After all, car just like LV bag, French perfume, Rolex watches, is a luxury for the rich play in this game. Although some people to buy thirty or forty thousand of the cars have become car owners, but the high cost of keeping a car car owners reckon this part of the veiled criticism. In fact, this is a self-inflicted, since the temporary enjoyment of other people to enjoy the resources can not afford a car, you should pay the price, this is a basic fairness.
more important, no matter how much you are saving the car emissions, as long as the burning of oil, it will have pollution, are harmful to the environment. If you travel at the expense of the public to enjoy at the expense of environmental protection, the Government subject to property taxes to you,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it would have no cause for justification. Therefore, this draft out of travel tax, I've always wondered, why the endless discussion above, the following people are talking about?
As the Bill provides that \Displacement of 1.0 liters and below the passenger cars to reduce the tax burden, large displacement is a substantial increase in passenger tax. \\\
me confused is that in the end who is the most interest? While in the community to maintain more than a million cars in 8500, about 3,500 more than a million private cars, freight cars about 30 million, nearly 20 million various types of official vehicles. But owners of 85 million, compared with 13 billion people, in the end who is the most people?
vehicle exhaust emissions drifting all the way from the city of the countryside, as the status symbol of the car, the reason for not paying taxes how seemed so weak. Of course, I do not want to deny the car this product has brought a new era of automotive negative culture, denying the convenience of car travel times. Even so, due to the development of urban road resources, lags behind the current growth rate of automobile consumption, a variety of private cars jam the streets is not caused by the bus trip to other people by caused inconvenience? Is not the time to give them the cost of causing enormous waste? In this sense, the Bill provides for the travel tax levy property taxes on cars, the starting point is not a problem.
Some people think that the energy saving as the banner of tax increases does not seem authentic. Of course, the draft, some unreasonable, for example, only by displacement as a sub-file standard, then, is really not fair. As Wuritu member said, \Great car to pay the same tax is clearly unreasonable. \After all, the general public does not enjoy the services of the two cars.
this sense,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], travel tax at the revised draft there, but in the end if we just stay in the \. Importantly, the travel tax should be fair and balanced perspective of public resources, tax money collected should be the people's living environment for environmental management, so that the travel tax will have actual meaning. Otherwise,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], no matter how much tax decoration items, not valuable. (Word no knife)